Staffing
Blog

Why Employers Can’t Separate Visa and Employment Obligations

DATE:

WRITTEN BY:

Picture of Leah Kang
Leah Kang

Immigration and Workforce Planning, EPG Group

Enabling global hiring through technology and compliance expertise Article - EPG Group

For Australian employers, keeping visa and employment obligations separate is no longer sufficient. The two are increasingly intertwined, and non-compliance in one area can have direct consequences in the other.

In many organisations, migration compliance still falls to global mobility or talent teams, while Fair Work sits under HR. That split can make sense on paper, but in practice it often leaves gaps. Regulators are now coordinating their efforts, and when compliance is handled in isolation, those gaps can turn into risks.

Through our work with clients, I’ve seen just how closely these two areas overlap. The way regulators assess risk and the way modern workforces operate has changed. With international hiring and remote work now the norm, businesses can’t afford to treat visa and workplace obligations as separate issues.

EPG Group's approach to international worker classification - EPG Group

Joint Compliance Crackdowns are Escalating

In September 2025, Fair Work Inspectors joined forces with the Australian Border Force (ABF) for unannounced visits to more than 40 Sydney businesses.

They looked at:

According to the Fair Work Ombudsman, recent inspections formed part of a national audit program focused on whether employers were meeting both workplace and immigration obligations. Over the past year, many employers have also reported inspectors arriving to conduct checks and distribute educational materials simultaneously.

This joint approach highlights a simple truth: visa and employment obligations can’t be separated. A worker’s visa conditions determine how their role must be structured, what duties they can perform, and how they must be paid. At the same time, everyday HR decisions, such as offering a fixed-term contract, changing a roster, or adjusting a classification, can have direct visa implications.

The Cost of Getting It Wrong

This push for alignment has been cemented through the Migration Amendment (Strengthening Employer Compliance) Act 2024, which expands regulators’ powers and introduces tougher consequences for breaches:

  1. Civil penalties of more than $90,000 per breach for companies
  2. Criminal prosecution for serious or repeated offences
  3. Loss of sponsorship approval or sponsorship bars

The fines alone are significant, but the reputational impact can be worse. Once a breach becomes public, it’s the media coverage, not the penalty, that does the most damage.

The recent Merivale and Hamilton Island underpayment cases are good examples. Each began with a regulator finding but quickly escalated into national headlines, shaping how both companies were perceived long after the audits ended.

Highlights real-world compliance risk in offshore employment - EPG Group

Bridging the Compliance Gap

At EPG, we regularly see how easily problems arise when migration and employment obligations are handled separately.

That’s why our model combines integrated advisory services with purpose-built technology through Xemplo. The platform connects visa management, payroll accuracy, and Fair Work compliance into one system so teams can see the full picture rather than fragments of it.

Together, our advisory and technology teams help employers:

From Reactive to Proactive Compliance

When systems and advice work together, compliance becomes something you stay ahead of instead of chase after. That shift reduces risk, saves time, and protects both the business and the people who work within it.

At EPG Group, our focus is helping employers close the gap between complex legal obligations and the reality of day-to-day workforce management. If you’d like to see what a connected compliance approach could look like for your organisation, we’re here to help.

Book a compliance review and make sure your business stays ahead of every change.

Leah Kang - EPG Group
Leah Kang

Special Counsel - Immigration and Workforce Planning, EPG Group

About our author: Leah Kang

Immigration and Workforce Planning Expert

With over a decade of experience advising businesses on employer-sponsored migration, Leah specialises in helping organisations navigate complex visa frameworks, manage compliance risks, and build effective talent strategies. She regularly advises on policy changes and strategic workforce planning for clients across a range of industries, including tech, healthcare, and professional services.

In this article:

Tags:

Share article:

More like this